Piraye Hacıgüzeller
Ghent University, Archaeology, Department Member
- Spatial analysis (Archaeology), Archaeological GIS, Archaeological Science, Archaeological Theory, Digital Archaeology, Social Archaeology, and 7 moreGIS and Landscape Archaeology, Spatial archaeology, Archaeological Methodology, Archaeological theory and practice, Geographic Information Systems (GIS), Spatial Analysis, and Non-representational theoriesedit
- I am a researcher at the Ghent Centre for Digital Humanities and Archaeology Department of Ghent University (Belgium)... moreI am a researcher at the Ghent Centre for Digital Humanities and Archaeology Department of Ghent University (Belgium). My research interests are the theory and practice of digital archaeology, specifically in the cases of geospatial data visualisation, management and analysis. I currently serve as the assistant director of the Sagalassos Archaeological Research Project and co-chair of the geohumanities working group within DARIAH (Digital Research Infrastructure for the Arts and Humanities; see www.dariah.eu).edit
- Frank Vermeulen (University of Ghent)edit
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Research Interests:
Over the past decade, collaborative mapping projects have become widespread, allowing for and promoting voluntary participation in cartographic processes. A major factor in the increasing popularity of collaborative mapping in recent... more
Over the past decade, collaborative mapping projects have become widespread, allowing for and promoting voluntary participation in cartographic processes. A major factor in the increasing popularity of collaborative mapping in recent years has been the developments in digital cartographic media in general and internet mapping in particular. In this paper the aim is to discuss the possibilities of online collaborative mapping in archaeology. Following an overview of collaborative mapping and its current state in today's increasingly online and digital world, four potential modes are introduced through which collaborative mapping in archaeology can be carried out: psychogeography, local community involvement, an online archaeology map system and spatial narratives.
Research Interests:
In this article, a case is made to reconceptualise archaeological cartography from a performative perspective. Through such a discussion the aim is not only to render archaeology an active part in related multidisciplinary discussions... more
In this article, a case is made to reconceptualise archaeological cartography from a performative perspective. Through such a discussion the aim is not only to render archaeology an active part in related multidisciplinary discussions within the field of critical mapping but also to open up possibilities for alternative mapping practices in the discipline. While pursuing this reconceptualisation, I first discuss how to rethink maps as performances. Subsequently, I present understanding archaeological maps as performances as a way to create alternatives to representational modes of thinking. Finally, I stress the timeliness of reconceptualising maps as performances in digital age.
Research Interests:
Geographical information systems (GIS) have been a part of archaeological research practices for over two decades, yet many significant questions related to the technology remain unanswered. Long-standing ambiguities about GIS use in... more
Geographical information systems (GIS) have been a part of archaeological research practices for over two decades, yet many significant questions related to the technology remain unanswered. Long-standing ambiguities about GIS use in archaeology can be associated with a particular research atmosphere within the discipline, where a large number of practitioners consider theory-laden critical approaches to GIS optional, if not peripheral, to conducting spatial analysis. This article calls on archaeological GIS practitioners to carry existing GIS theory and critique to another level. It also argues that the critique of the epistemological implications of GIS use in archaeology has largely (and at times rather implicitly) been structured by representational thinking habits and that a move to non-representational thinking would provide novel considerations of the technology.
Research Interests: Archaeology, Landscape Archaeology, Archaeological Science, Digital Archaeology, Archaeological Method & Theory, and 7 moreArchaeological GIS, Social Archaeology, Archaeological Theory, Spatial archaeology, Archaeological Methodology, Archaeological theory and practice, and GIS and Landscape Archaeology
This paper presents an innovative methodology based on cost analyses used to quantify human circulation and spatial configuration within the Neopalatial Palace at Malia, Crete. The study focuses on the Late Minoan I architectural phases... more
This paper presents an innovative methodology based on cost analyses used to quantify human circulation and spatial configuration within the Neopalatial Palace at Malia, Crete. The study focuses on the Late Minoan I architectural phases of the Palace and assesses the effects of the second phase modifications on the circulation. It can be shown that during the first phase, circulation was less restricted than during the second phase. The second phase modifications altered the west entrance system and complicated thecirculation pattern within the West Wing of the palace drastically.
Research Interests:
A set of spatial and statistical analyses has been conducted on material from the site of Palaikastro on Crete with the principal aim of synthesizing a methodology for effectively questioning an archaeological intra-site dataset by means... more
A set of spatial and statistical analyses has been conducted on material from the site of Palaikastro on Crete with the principal aim of synthesizing a methodology for effectively questioning an archaeological intra-site dataset by means of Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and statistics. The present study is part of this set of analyses. In earlier studies, the artifactual and architectural data were displayed and described visually using GIS. Additionally, artifactual data were statistically described using univariate and bivariate graphs. The aim of the present study is to test the significance of the spatial associations, hypothesized in former studies, according to these visual and statistical descriptions. The hypotheses concern the spatial associations between architectural features and artifact groups as well as the associations between two artifact groups. Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Chi-squared tests are used for the significance testing. GIS is utilized to query the data.
Research Interests:
This study utilizes GIS to manage and analyse the artefactual data at Palaikastro, a Bronze Age site on Crete. Data from the 1986-1996 excavation seasons are assigned keywords, and then queried during the analyses according to their raw... more
This study utilizes GIS to manage and analyse the artefactual data at Palaikastro, a Bronze Age site on Crete. Data from the 1986-1996 excavation seasons are assigned keywords, and then queried during the analyses according to their raw materials, interpretations, types, attributed chronological phases, or any logical combination of these four. The analyses are performed to discuss the role of GIS as an intra-site database management tool in archaeological projects and to test the existence of meaningful and consistent spatial patterning of artefacts across the area considered. The study concludes that the power of GIS in handling archaeological spatial data in Palaikastro is indisputable. Having examined the artefacts’ spatial patterning, this study also concludes that at Palaikastro, certain structures show distinctive functionalities, some of which were already pointed out by the excavators mainly relying on architectural evidences.
